199
submitted 1 year ago by gobbling871@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Oracle responds to Red Hat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Note that they still share code for much of Darwin, even where the license does not require it: https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

True, but from what I hear, the dumps don't really help much. Better than nothing, I suppose

[-] Jagger2097@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If they wanted their code to be sharealike, the developers could have chosen a different license. Apple is contributing more than is required so don't complain?

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The point is Apple doesn't actually want to help the community - they might be hoping that someone goes through their dumps and finds a vulnerability and reports it to them. Free community sourced labour.

If they really wanted to help, MacOS should have been GPLv3. But we know that's not how Apple functions.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
199 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

45530 readers
1717 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS