this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
322 points (98.8% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How to contact your MEP.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 120 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Fourthly, scanning for known, thus old material does not help identify and rescue victims, or prevent child sexual abuse. It will actually make safeguarding victims more difficult by pushing criminals to secure, decentralised communication channels which are impossible to intercept even with a warrant.

This point is huge, and on its own explains why half baked compromises are worthless.

The criminals will use banned chat apps, while innocent people get their messages read.

[โ€“] taladar@feddit.de 98 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The reason they don't care about that is that the whole thing isn't about protecting children at all but about surveillance of the vast majority of people.

[โ€“] MentalEdge@ani.social 38 points 11 months ago

This. There are already plans on expanding what the surveillance is used for, as soon as it is possible to begin with.

"Think of the children" is just the trick they're using to get their foot in the door. It being utterly ineffective in doing what they claim it'll do, is irrelevant.

[โ€“] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well that's the point, catching CSAM is just a very convenient excuse. Once that's through, it will just be a matter of extending it to terrorism. Then you can declare anyone a terrorist and bam you have free reign to monitor anyone you want.

[โ€“] taladar@feddit.de 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or you could just accuse them of the really dangerous crimes, like copyright violations or insulting politicians.

[โ€“] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That requires some kind of proof or bureaucratic fuckery. If you take any ecologist group for instance, you just have to pin a terrorist label on them, and bam, now you can spy on them legally. They're trying to do it in France right now.

[โ€“] taladar@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

Germany too. They are trying to label the climate change protests by the "Letzte Generation" (Last generation) group as organized crime and terrorism.

[โ€“] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago

Your first mistake was assuming it's an attempt in good faith.