this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
451 points (97.7% liked)

Funny

6613 readers
318 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well that depends on what your definition of AI is. IMO if pathfinding is AI then GLaDOS is definitely AI

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Actually A* is deterministic thus simply intelligently designed, but not intelligent itself. Nobody considers that AI.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't necessarily consider pathfinding AI, but I don't like that reasoning. If ai coded a set of rules for a units behavior, if that behavior responds to different conditions, I'd consider it AI. Even though it is purely deterministic.

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

That would make any non-trivial piece of code AI. Like ffmpeg, for example, or a chess computer. Complicated tools, sure, but with a bit of effort you can predict how they will behave in a given circumstance. Meaning you could set a trap for the chess computer and it would walk right into it. Every single time. No learning occurs.
Until a few years ago AI was effectively synonymous with AGI, Artificial General Intelligence, which requires the software to be able to adapt to new situations and be able to solve even unknown problems with as few or fewer attempts than a human would need.