this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
148 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

59676 readers
3219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
148
Google asks Congress to not ban teens from social media (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by JunglGeorg@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/16/23919221/google-youtube-child-safety-age-verification-laws-privacy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Ban them, exile them all!

Edit: Ok, i may have been a bit too vague with this comment. So i'll be more specific. ⬇️

Some platforms like Tiktok, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube have been nothing but harmful to youngsters (from all ages), due to their manipulative algorithm and poor content management.

So i do believe there should be a much more stronger restriction in access to those platforms.

Something like, you can register at 16 with your parent's permission, or something like that.

Now i now that sounds very drastic, but consider this:

1- It has been proven time and time again how social media has done more harm than good to teenagers.

2- I'm only talking about about platforms owned by the big corporations, platforms here on the Fediverse are (from my perspective) much more safer (in the sense that you don't really see harmful content if you don't want to).

[–] H2207@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'm a teen and I second this opinion.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

1- It has been proven time and time again how social media has done more harm than good to teenagers.

2- I’m only talking about about platforms owned by the big corporations, platforms here on the Fediverse are (from my perspective) much more safer (in the sense that you don’t really see harmful content if you don’t want to).

  1. Where has it been proven that its done more harm than good? Have studies been done to actually explore what 'good' it has allowed, or is the litmus test for it only about what harm may have been affected on teenagers? Whats your basis for this claim?

  2. The Fediverse is equally unsafe if you consider your take in an objective manner rather than just play on what you feel moment to moment.

  3. What's your take on 4chan?

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl -1 points 1 year ago
  1. Ever since teens had access to social media, there have been studies on the matter, (i'll admit, that in early years they were pretty scandalous, but now they try to act as more of a guide or recommendation for parents).

Here you got one source (again, of many):

https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/news-and-events/news/2023/10/06/new-study-reveals-teenagers-social-media-use-and-safety-concerns.html

  1. The Fediverse is mostly handled by moderators and the community (like Reddit used to be), so when there's an issue regarding ill behaviour, it is usually handled inside that community. (And besides, instances have their own rules too.)

  2. It's toxic waste, get the hell out of there. 💀☢️

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something like, you can register at 16 with your parent’s permission

Point is - how do you prove the person is of the "right" age noninvasively? Not like the mainstream social media platforms were already friendly to anonymity, but all the methods I can think of are on a whole another level.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know, that's very muddy waters right there.

But again, i only meant that for the big platforms.

I don't think age verification should be necessary on the Fediverse.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why?

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because a vast majority of teenagers misuse/overuse social media (cyber-bullying, social isolation, phone addiction, and so on...)

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you know that?

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Because i was born in the year 2000 so my perception of teenagers and social media is still recent, also i have a younger sibling, and she has shown me the kind of crap teens are on today.

Screw TikTok man, and also screw "Mr. Beast".

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So your experience defines everyone else's experience?

How very 'I was born in the year 2000' of you.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 0 points 1 year ago

Everyone's opinion is equally valid.

But my guess is some may want to read what Gen Z's think about the topic.