this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
25 points (87.9% liked)

MTG

1910 readers
15 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"The Set Booster and Draft Booster are being combined into a new type of booster we're calling the Play Booster."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Considering about 33% of a set is rares, yeah, it is a big change. ~~Looking at draft, that's a 96% chance to open one more rare, and 83% chance to open two. If my math is right, that's 13 more rares in a pod on average.~~ (Don't math while waking up) The correct figure would be ~16 extra rares per pod.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I think it's just 8 extra rares/mythics per pod.

Assuming all the special guests are r/m, The List slot has 3.12% chance of being a rare.

About 1/7 (14.3%) foils is r/m.

We don't know the distribution of rarity in the wildcard slot, but I'll use the same distribution as the foils for a reasonable estimate.

That makes (3.12+14.3+14.3 ~=) 32 extra rares per 100 packs, or just under 8 per 24 packs.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Regarding the specific chances, considering they detailed the odds for the List spot but not the wildcards, I think it's more reasonable to assume chances are equal to the percentage of rares in a given set, which can vary dramatically, but I believe it's usually about 33%.

As for the math, I definitely went about it wrong (I was using 1-p^n^ for some reason, and I also did that wrong somehow). The right result would be closer to 16 rares per pod.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I think it’s more reasonable to assume chances are equal to the percentage of rares in a given set, which can vary dramatically, but I believe it’s usually about 33%.

Why would they not adjust for rarity in this slot? They do it in all the other slots - it seems like a big leap to think that any specific common that can appear in this slot is equally as likely as any specific mythic.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)