I just downloaded and have been loving this. It loads pretty quickly, navigation is intuitive, and I'll finally stop forgetting that Nebula exists because it'll all be in my one big subscription feed.

Since I'm new to moving over to open source, I want to ask the veterans: is this as incredible as it seems right now, or is there something I'm missing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, this doesn't fill me with confidence whatsoever they're not going to rugpull down the line. This is just empty words when their actual license prevents one from being the "master of your computer once again".

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So how else would you combat malicious forks like what happened to new pipe? Honest question, I like this standard even if there are always more truly open source licenses, if this could become a standard that helps prevent bad actors from taking advantage of less savy users that's a big win to me and a move in the right direction all while being able to see the source code download it modify if i deem fit and install it. Perfect is the enemy of progress. What's your solution?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What happened to newpipe is the fault of Google's police's not allowing an official newpipe, not of Foss. The same issue can happen with this software just as well. There's plenty of Foss which doesn't have this issue, like Firefox

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok but if Google is not willing to support this effort, like I asked what's your solution besides just letting it happen? Because that's not gonna spark confidence for mass adoption to move away from these bloated ad and tracker filled mainstream apps. You need to have steps for progress and this allows more control when those who are publishing said knock off applications in their store will not.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It doesn't matter whose fault it is.

If the same thing happens with this software, they will have it taken down. That's why the license exists.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nice edit.

The reason why this happens only to newpipe and not to other Foss software like Firefox is because Google prevents an official newpipe on the app store. The could do the same with this app and license or not they'd have the same problem

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

No, it doesn't?

[–] Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So how else would you combat malicious forks like what happened to new pipe?

Trademarks. Anyone malicious can take your source-available code anyway, but if they infringe on your trademark by calling it "Firefox" or "Newpipe", you are legally in your right to take it down. Trademarks deal with fraud; copyright doesn't.

Iceweasel is a classic example of what happens when free software projects like Firefox seek to defend their trademark. They didn't want to allow Debian to use the Firefox name, as that may cause users to attribute quality problems to Mozilla when Debian is actually responsible because of the patches they had made.

Want to remove an app using the GrayJay name without your permission if it's a registered trademark? Here's a link to report it to Google Play.