this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
578 points (89.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5490 readers
751 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 11 months ago (41 children)

Under literally any ethical system you choose.

Forget harm to the animal for a moment.

Breeding animals to slaughter is more water, land and time intensive than growing crops, and produces substantially fewer calories for even more land area. Breeding animals to slaughter also generates far more CO2 then crops, either from the animal directly or from transport and butchering processes.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago (9 children)

If it's pure calories you're after, might I suggest Uranium? It's pretty cheap considering what you can theoretically get out of it.

^/s

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I don't think that you Uranium contains any calories.

[–] MjolnirThyme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

A calorie is the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature one kg of water by 1°C, so uranium has quite a few, hard to digest though.

Edit: I was curious so I looked it up, 1 gram of uranium has 20 billion calories

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Microdosing time!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)