this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
47 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

31195 readers
797 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been using Brave for the past three or so years but I do know that Linux/privacy enthusiasts tend to swear by Firefox. Wanted to get people's thoughts on this topic to see if I should be making a potential switch. Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Brave has tried one scam after another before. I wouldn't trust it for a second for any use.

[–] Voxel@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

Please provide any evidence for your false claim.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Depends on what you call a scam. I am not sure it's the right word, but duplicitous behavior and definite privacy violations (even if by negligence) are absolutely true.

They have sent out direct mailers that basically equated to a customer list leak; also I'd take a peek at the wikipedia entry about their business model, which mentions some stuff that isn't the most savory:

... Brave earns revenue from ads by taking a 15% cut of publisher ads and a 30% cut of user ads. User ads are notification-style pop-ups, while publisher ads are viewed on or in association with publisher content.

On 6 June 2020, a Twitter user pointed out that Brave inserts affiliate referral codes when users navigate to Binance

In regards to the mailers, they messed up and passed blame,

In this process, our EDDM vendor made a significant mistake by not excluding names, but instead including names before addresses, resulting in the distribution of personalized mailers.

With regards to the CEO, he made a donation to an anti-LGBT cause when he was CEO of Mozilla in 2008. He lost his job at Mozilla due to his anti-LGBT stance.

He also spreads COVID misinformation.

[–] Voxel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Tbh. Mozilla wasn't better in the past and as long it doesn't affect the product I don't mind the political views of the owner (it's still concerning). As long Brave can provide me better privacy and security for my daily browsing I will continue using and recommending it. And listening to Wikipedia he stepped back, by himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)