this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
119 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

59087 readers
3267 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
119
Google urges US lawmakers not to ban teenagers from social media. (indusbusinessjournal.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Google urges US lawmakers not to ban teenagers from social media.::San Francisco– Google has asked the US Congress not to ban teenagers from social media, urging lawmakers to drop problematic protections like age-verification technology. The tech giant released its ‘Legislative Framework to Protect Children and Teens Online’ that came as more lawmakers, like Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), pushed for the Kids Online Safety Act, a …

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flamingarms@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I believe the States have that already, with their age verification bullshit for porn. Doesn't seem like serious privacy violations are a concern for them.

[–] Waldemar_Firehammer@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's nothing like that in the US that I'm aware of, though some states have tried.

[–] nunchuk@lemmy.bigsecretwebsite.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Utah did it, or is at least experimenting with it

[–] Waldemar_Firehammer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right, I didn't realize the lawsuit had been thrown out. The fact remains the law is completely unenforceable without serious privacy violations.