this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
75 points (95.2% liked)

World News

32292 readers
560 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/7659731

HELSINKI/VILNIUS, Oct 20 (Reuters) - An investigation into the damage to the Balticonnector gas pipeline is currently focused on the role of the Chinese NewNew Polar Bear container vessel, Finland's National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) said on Friday.

Early on Oct. 8, a gas pipeline and a telecoms cable connecting Finland and Estonia were broken, in what Finnish investigators said may have been sabotage, though they have yet to conclude whether it was an accident or a deliberate act.

On Tuesday, Sweden said a third link, connecting Stockholm to Tallinn, had been damaged at roughly the same time as the other two.

"The police have established in the criminal investigation that the movements of the vessel NewNew Polar Bear flying the flag of Hong Kong coincide with the time and place of the gas pipeline damage," NBI said in a statement.

"For this reason, the investigation is now focused on the role of the said vessel," the Finnish investigators added.

Following Finland's NBI statement, Estonian investigators, who are also looking into the telecoms cable incidents, said they were still looking at two ships, the NewNew Polar Bear and Russia's Sevmorput.

"We have identified that during the incidents, the vessels NewNew Polar Bear and Sevmorput were in the area. We are still investigating whether or not these vessels had anything to do with the damage," they said in a statement to Reuters.

Only these two ships were present at all three incident sites around the approximate time when the damage occurred, according to vessel tracking data reviewed by Reuters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that is strange. I'm still finding it hard to find any possible motivation for a commercial ship from Hong Kong (which still has a high degree of political autonomy) doing this. How would the interests of Hong Kong be served by damaging this infrastructure? Maybe they're not actually involved in it if it is sabotage.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It being registered in Hong Kong doesn't necessarily tell us much about who's operating the ship though.

Other suspicious ships being looked into are a couple of ships registered in Liberia: the Viktor Bakaev which is owned by SCF Novoship in Russia, and the Pskov which is owned by Sovcomflot and likewise in Russia

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why is the article calling it a Chinese ship? Seems awfully xenophobic if that is the case.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good question. Based on a quick search that led me to Lloyd's Register, it looks like its registered owner is a Chinese company called Hainan Xin Xin Yang Shipping, so that's probably why?