675
submitted 8 months ago by Wogi@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 61 points 8 months ago

There is a vast difference to other games. The core is fine, mechanics work perfectly, the game looks great, it has just bad performance. That can be fixed.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 33 points 8 months ago

Yeah... but some people wish for more finished games and that includes performance.

Like I get it it's playable... and some games release in much worse state but unless it's an indie game with zero money that needs that early money to continue they should wait.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

A company like Paradox should certainly be able afford testers who run the game on a variety of configurations to see if optimization is necessary.

One thing I would say and this is a broad statement - generally you don't do optimization unless you know you need it. And you only do it after the thing you're writing is working correctly non-optimally. Optimize too soon, or when you don't need to just makes code an unmaintainable mess. That doesn't doesn't preclude writing efficient code in the first place but efficient is not the same thing as optimal.

[-] verysoft@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Why pay for testing when consumers will happily pay the developers to do it? They will even defend your unfinished product for free!

[-] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

I am absolutely with you there. I do not like the fact that the performance is pretty bad. But a game that „just“ has performance issues is potentially fixable. Games where the core gameplay loop is broken are usually not getting better over time.

And I will play City Skylines for years to come so buying it right now and playing with lower settings and less then stellar performance is fine and I will hopefully be able to increase these things over time.

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

There's just one thing I want to know:
Is it more, or less complex than Anno 1800?

[-] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

More complex but you have less control over what is produced, it's more about getting workers to their jobs and transporting goods efficiently than making efficient production lines.

[-] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago

as someone who has yet to successfully raise a city in anno 1800 without going broke, this scares me

[-] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I haven't made a city in cities skylines 2 without going broke yet

[-] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

how are you finding it overall?

[-] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

More difficult but (other than performance) much better compared to the first game with no dlc

[-] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

awesome! just finished my new build (7800x3d / 7900xtx) might look into it. im sure the performance issues are going to be sorted soon

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

So not very interesting to the German in me, got it

Now that I think about it, I did grab the first one on Epic that one time. Didn't run very well though.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
675 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

44094 readers
2435 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS