this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
590 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More or less Tesla's autopilot is not as safe as Tesla would have you believe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wiitigo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Still almost exactly half the crash rate of human-only drivers. Therefore, we should ban human-only driving.

[–] RandomBit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t think this is a fair comparison since an Autopilot crash is a 2 stage failure: the Autopilot and then the driver both failed to avoid the crash. The statistics do not include the incidents where Autopilot would have crashed but the human took control and prevented it. If all instances of human intervention were included, I doubt Autopilot would be ahead.

[–] Kepler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If all instances of human intervention were included, I doubt Autopilot would be ahead.

Why would you interpret non-crashes due to human intervention as crashes? If you're doing that for autopilot non-crashes you've gotta be consistent and also do that for non-autopilot non-crashes, which is basically...all of them.

[–] RandomBit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

If a human crashes and their action/vehicle is responsible for the crash, the crash should be attributed to the human (excepting mechanical failure, etc). I believe that if an advanced safety systems, such as automatic braking, that prevent a crash that otherwise would have occurred, the prevented crash should also be included in the human tally. Likewise, if Autopilot would have crashed if not for the intervention of the driver, the prevented crash should be attributable to Autopilot.

As has been often studied, the major problem for autonomous systems is that until they are better than humans WITHOUT human intervention, the result can be worse than both. People are much less likely to pay full attention and have the same reaction times if the autonomous system is in full control the majority of the time.

load more comments (7 replies)