this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
43 points (95.7% liked)

Privacy

31866 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has used a system called Giant Oak Search Technology (GOST) to help the agency scrutinize social media posts, determine if they are “derogatory” to the U.S., and then use that information as part of immigration enforcement, according to a new cache of documents reviewed by 404 Media.

The documents peel back the curtain on a powerful system, both in a technological and a policy sense—how information is processed and used to decide who is allowed to remain in the country and who is not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are indexing publicly available social media posts aren’t they? It’s not a policy matter if you’re voluntarily offering it to everyone.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the country where free speech is something the government is supposed to not retaliate against right?

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is Immigration. People are voluntarily applying to come to the US. Their public social media posts being reviewed isn't a privacy violation. Even if it's done on US citizens, it's public information. Regardless on whether it's a good idea or not, it's not a privacy issue. You're voluntarily giving up the privacy of the information you do and say in public. If they utilize non-public information then you have an argument.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago