this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
53 points (96.5% liked)

Futurology

1386 readers
1 users here now

Futurology: A space for the discussion of the future of us - the human organism, and the relationship we have with the spaces we may inhabit.

I have only two rules for this community:

** Respect the Community.**

** Respect one another.**

Freedom of speech comes with freedom to experience consequence.

Enjoy this community, enrich yourself as you enrich others. If you have any questions about this community or how it is run, you are welcome to contact the moderator.

Asstronaut

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DistractedDev@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I've seen it's that they just aren't ready. They don't actually work that well, they're fragile, and very expensive. I agree they should still at least give them to more people than they seem to be doing. Some people have to be able to afford them even if they need replaced often.

[–] DarkMessiah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think the main issue is that the people who can afford them as they are, upkeep and all, usually aren’t the same people who need them. After all, when’s the last time you saw a fairly well-off person missing a hand?

The American health care extortion racket doesn’t help matters either. Getting the “insurance” companies to pay out for anything is like pulling teeth, and America is, by far, the most widely publicised demographic; so when people there aren’t getting these things when they need them, they lose most of their potential funding because very few people actually know enough about them to care.