this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43905 readers
1015 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There's no "lore". Kbin uses /m/ for "magazines". Every freakin' site needs to come up with its own word for the social/data structures that are obviously correctly called "forums".

Or maybe "newsgroups".

[–] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

bit of lore about the word "forum"

you would think it was the centralized providers marketing that moved from the word first but in reality it was the forums themselves. When you didn't want your employees wasting time on the internet you would block certain words in the URI rather than certain domains. Words like "forum" and "chat" were perma-filtered at many workplaces like reddit or some other sites are today.

Many sites migrated away from using the word "forum" initially by hacking up thier default forum installs (some of those early php apps SUCKED) years before subs.

1-letter path names became a good way to obfuscate.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't surprise me. The industry jumped over to "HTTPS everywhere" as soon as it was politically convenient — but one good reason was to prevent people from building "filtering" middleware without having to hire someone who understood enough of Bruce Schneier to explain why filtering URLs wasn't a thing you wanted to be doing in the first place.

[–] dan@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Personally I think “communities” is the closest we’ve got to a generic name for those things.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This but the plural is "fora".

[–] CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk if you're being serious, but "forums" is also accepted and isn't wrong.

[–] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We're speaking English. "Forums" is just as, if not more correct than "fora"

[–] burningmatches@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

We’re speaking English.

Barely

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Nemo@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...in latine manet?

Nescio, nemo sum.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

... sit, altum viditur.

("Whatever is said in Latin is seen as elevated." / "If you say it in Latin, it sounds more profound.")

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

I still yearn to go back to the original forums.

No, not PHPBB or Usenet.

I mean like the Roman one.