182
submitted 8 months ago by Snorf@reddthat.com to c/usa@lemmy.ml

The new version of the legislation has not yet been made public, according to Marijuana Moment. But when originally introduced, the bill was seen as an alternative to the Marijuana Opportunity and Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, a federal cannabis legalization measure supported by many Democrats. The MORE Act was refiled in September by Representative Jerrold Nadler, the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, with co-sponsorship from 33 fellow Democrats.

Under the original version of Mace’s bill, cannabis would be removed from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, and the states would be allowed to take the lead on marijuana legalization and regulation for their jurisdictions. At the federal level, cannabis would be regulated like alcohol, with the U.S. Department of Agriculture responsible for regulating growers while medical uses would be overseen by the Food and Drug Administration.

House Lawmakers Introduce Bipartisan Marijuana Legalization BillThe STATES Reform Act also ensures safe harbor for state medical marijuana programs and patient access to medicinal cannabis. The legislation also specifically protects the use of medical cannabis as a treatment for arthritis, cancer, chronic pain, sickle cell disease, HIV/AIDS and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Criminal justice reform provisions of the bill include the release of prisoners convicted of federal nonviolent cannabis-related offenses and the expungement of records of such convictions. Cartel members, agents of cartel gangs, or those convicted of driving under the influence will not be eligible for relief, however. Mace’s office estimated that approximately 2,600 federal prisoners would be released if the legislation is signed into law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I don't understand the point of regulating marijuana growing at all. Seems like just another way for the government to make excuses to find another tax revenue stream

[-] comador@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

Regulation is in the Public's Interest. Sure, you may see it as a Government revenue stream, but it has merit. Regulating industries results in:

  • Better, quality products
  • Preventing price fixing and monopolies
  • Promoting growth and innovation without fear of competitive retaliation
  • To ensure the true costs and benefits are reflected in the market

TL;DR: We wouldn't want the marijuana mafia price fixing our weed man.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

I agree for industrial, but small scale it shouldn't be. If you want to just grow some for your use, and maybe some for friends/family/neighbors or whatever not for profit, you should be allowed to.

[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 2 points 8 months ago

You can currently brew your own alcohol, so I highly doubt that marijuana wouldn't see a similar system. I think where I am the limit is 50 gallons a year of wine, not sure on beer. If marijuana has similar rules, you could grow enough for yourself and your neighborhood street's personal use for a year.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Most places it's legal the limit is pretty low to grow your own though. It's not close to consistent with the alcohol ruling.

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
182 points (98.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

6942 readers
244 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS