755
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] direfield@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Huh why ? This doesn't make sense

[-] MaxAmperage@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

There's been a big effort to block anybody with a blue checkmark since any major story or viral post will have them automatically bumped up to the top of the replies. So, when the whiners started complaining, he started openly considering this.

[-] dimspace@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

He will end up "compromising".

You can block people, but only people without blue check marks.

Wanna harass someone, wanna be a troll, subscribe to Twitter blue and you can't be blocked...

[-] sensibilidades@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Aren't there different twitter tiers, too? Like, blue and gold? I wonder if you'll only be allowed to block people in your tier and below, so that unpaid accounts can't block anybody

[-] sgtlighttree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

IIRC the gold checkmarks are reserved for big corporate accounts that want it, and Twitter demands $1000/mo for that. Incredible.

[-] sensibilidades@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, imagine how much value he'd be adding to the gold checkmark by restricting who could block them

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
755 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
245 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS