this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
629 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers
1658 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aCosmicWave@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

β€œThis sentence is a lie” sounds false but is actually true. I think?

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A description is "autological" if it describes itself. For example:

  • "Short" is a short word, so it is autological.
  • The phrase "excessively verbose, wordy, redundant, repetitious, repetitious, and prolix" also describes itself, so it too is autological.
  • "Written in English" is written in English, so it is autological.

A description is "heterological" if it does not describe itself. For example:

  • "Long" is not a long word; so it is heterological.
  • "Bisyllabic" is not a bisyllabic word, so it is heterological.
  • "Written in Arabic" is not written in Arabic, so it is heterological.

Now, is the word "heterological" itself heterological?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

The following phrase is autological: "is currently being read by an idiot"

[–] bhez@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Liar.

Well, that makes it true then.

[–] scruffyvic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not easy to say whether it is or not. This is something called the Liar Paradox and it has a surprising amount of potential solutions. That article linked explains it really well but, be warned, it is a bit dry.

The solution one of my professors gave that makes most sense to me is that, as a standalone sentence, "this sentence is a lie" is neither true nor false. At first glance the sentence makes sense and "lie" leads us to think that there is an untruth somewhere but there can't be as there is no 'truth value' within it. That is to say that there is nothing in the sentence that can either be true or false therefore there is nothing that can be lied about.

Only one of many potential solutions so though. So, maybe?