this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
868 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

45537 readers
227 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ziggurism@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Modern conceptions of medieval warfare drastically overestimate the amount of usage that swords saw in battle. At least that’s a thing I’ve heard.

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if technology was pushed towards ranged weapons like bows, crossbows, catapults, and trebuchets

I mean I’m sure there would be a good amount of swords or other close quarters melee units the keep the enemy at bay while everyone else is relatively safe from getting stabbed firing from a distance

I have no source just pure speculation

[–] CalamityBalls@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For trebuchets at least, they were only siege weapons, took a long time to both assemble and fire. Though I must concede they were better than melee weapons for knocking down walls.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

In Monty Python and the Holy Grail, as the Frenchmen start raining animals at the knights and they all turn and run, Lancelot (being the brave one) takes one last whack at the stone castle wall with his sword before joining the rest in retreat. Always loved that little detail.

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Good to know. I just knew that they were just ranged so this is going into the “neat information that will in no way help me with my life” pile

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)