this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
290 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58431 readers
4511 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Cooper Davis Act would force tech companies to report suspected drug activity to the government. Experts say it would be a disaster for digital privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Alcohol, cigars and then... cocaine, LSD, crack? Are you honestly making this comparison?

Could you look someone in the eye and tell that cocaine and tobacco are the same thing?

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The fact that you put LSD between cocaine and crack made me literally lol.

You've clearly lived a very sheltered life and have been fed all of your information on drugs from entertainment media.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maye LSD is "less bad" than the others, fine. I'm not a drug connoisseur.

[–] TrontheTechie@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That was obvious when you posted cocaine then crack.

It showed that not only are you not a connoisseur, but your understanding of drugs is most likely mainstream fiction and copaganda regurgitated as news.

Crack is just cocaine that has been processed so you can smoke it instead of snorting or injecting it.

Disclaimer: don’t Fuck around with cocaine, it dumps your dopamine and eventually makes it impossible to feel happiness outside of continued use, and the use diminishes in its dopamine dumps

Edit: I didn’t even read the comment two up, they had the same assessment, lol

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Disclaimer: don’t Fuck around with cocaine, it dumps your dopamine and eventually makes it impossible to feel happiness outside of continued use, and the use diminishes in its dopamine dumps

Thank you for agreeing with my anti-drug agenda. You are correct in this sentence, we must ban cocaine immediately and persecute anyone involved in its production and distribution.

I wish you a long life, dear friend, even though I know you'll die young.

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish you a long life, dear friend, even though I know you’ll die young.

Did you just threaten that user or are you accusing them of abusing illicit substances because they possess medical knowledge of the effects of cocaine?

[–] TrontheTechie@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Locking people in cages hasn’t fixed the problem yet

Even if I thought you were gonna go home and kill yourself tonight, I wouldn’t feel the compulsive need to rub it in your face.

I think you should probably work that all out with a therapist. It sounds like you probably have some CPTSD from growing up in an unstable environment due to parental drug abuse.

I've found this channel to be particularly useful to me in my journey.

Best of luck in your healing journey ❤️

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/channel/UCbWvYupGqq3aMJ6LsG4q-Yg

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you consider medical professionals to be 'drug connoisseurs'?

[–] TrontheTechie@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

More like drug sommeliers if we are going to utilize the analogy to its fullest /s

[–] LemmyNameMyself@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

not a drug connoisseur.

wants all drugs banned because "drugs > bad"

[–] markr@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • alcohol deaths per year: 140,000
  • tobacco deaths per year: 480,000
  • cocaine deaths per year: 15,000 (including crack)
  • opioid deaths per year: 68,000
  • LSD deaths per year: 0
  • cannabis deaths per year: 0

Our drug war is a fucking farce. It is, and always has been, a fascist culture war.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now we're talking, I like to see numbers and data. You're clearly different from the others here.

Now go a biiit further and check usage statistics for alcohol, cocaine and opioids. Is it the same number of people using all three?

[–] markr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No thanks. But you go right ahead.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now, now, I wonder how many dozens of millions of people are using cocaine each year.

[–] markr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cocaine is not particularly dangerous. Oddly enough opioids are safe if, and only if, the user knows the specific opioid being used and it’s actual purity and doesn’t use improper techniques to use it. It doesn’t usually kill or cause major medical issues if the dosage and purity are known and clean needles are used. Alcohol is a medical issue at basically any dosage. There is no safe way to consume it. Tobacco is in the same category: all use is harmful, smoking is excessively harmful.

The point is we tolerate obviously harmful drugs, some of us refuse to admit they are drugs, or put them in some category where they should not be considered when discussing drug abuse. Why do people do this? As I said, it seems very much to be a cultural issue. Alcohol and tobacco, by far our most lethal drug abuse problems, are accepted as part of ‘our’ culture. By ‘our’ I mean the dominant European Christian culture- white people. The ‘bad’ drugs are all associated with ‘outsiders’, people not part of the dominant culture. Quite obviously also this cultural categorization is racist bullshit. White people are just as likely to be using the ‘bad’ drugs as non white people. So it’s an ideological campaign to justify what has become a corrupt government/capitalist ‘complex’. The failed drug war pumps billions of dollars into the private sector. There is no motivation to stop what is a quite successful system as far as the recipients of all that loot are concerned.

But certainly just simply adopting a harm reduction approach instead of continuing the idiocy of criminalization cannot be taken seriously. After all we cannot compare cigars to LSD.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cocaine is not particularly dangerous.

Stopped reading here.

[–] markr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your mind is closed. Here is an interesting study on circulatory issues related to cocaine, tobacco, and combined usage. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199402173300702

Note that cocaine alone appeared to be less harmful than tobacco, for the focus of the study: Coronary-Artery Vasoconstriction

But you know better.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"drugs are actually healthy"

Do you agree with the statement above?

[–] TrontheTechie@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doctors do, otherwise they wouldn't be using them.

Doctors gave my SO's mom Fentanyl. What she has is pure, clean, dosed properly, and basically harmless.

“All things are poison and nothing is without poison; only the dose makes a thing not a poison.”

~Theophrastus von Hohenheim the father of pharmacological medicine

I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you have no medical background whatsoever, because being a medical professional wouldn't allow you to have such a black and white thought process on such a nuanced topic as whether a drug was healthy or not. Vitamins are considered healthy, but if you take too much vitamin A you're brain is gonna swell up and take on water, your bones are gonna hurt, your nails will become brittle and break, etc. If you don't have enough you will go night blind, have trouble conceiving, get terrible acne, and be unable to heal wounds.

[–] Version@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not saying crack or other drugs are harmless, but man, have you ever seen an alcohol addict? It completely destroys your body, mind and family (which you like to mention when it comes to other drugs). You can absolutely compare it to crack.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see, so you're arguing we must ban both alcohol and drugs? You bring a hard bargain, I'm interested in the connotations of this.

[–] Version@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This has already been tried and didn‘t work. People consumed it anyway (surprise).

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Version@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you tell me how it affects or even hurts anyone if someone is smoking weed at home? There is literally no point in making it illegal. What you can do is making it illegal to do certain things while under the influence of drugs, for example driving a car. And guess what, exactly this happens with alcohol too. But making the drug itself illegal is imo a bad idea.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're progressing, we're already talking about limitations and regulations and control in general!

This has been productive for both of us, keep up walking the good path, friend.

[–] Version@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The drug market currently is completely unregulated. It‘s easier for a teenager to buy weed, than alcohol. If we make it legal, we can actually regulate it, like alcohol.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This exact mentality, applied to guns, led to the school shooting situation in the US.

Also

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), globally, it is estimated that about 1 in 3 women (or approximately 33%) have experienced physical and/or sexual violence at some point in their lives

Shall we legalize groping? Legalize it (it's unavoidable) and then regulate it (applies rules to how long you can touch, where you can touch, etc)

[–] Version@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, missing regulation led to the school shooting situation in the US. Just legalizing won‘t solve any issues, without any proper regulations.

Consuming drugs is your choice, it only affects your body, life and mind. Sexual assault and drugs can not even be remotely compared.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It affects everyone nearby, many children have developed respiratory issues due to their parent's usage of tobacco, drugs make it even worse, you lose control of yourself and ruins the lives of everyone nearby.

Where are you from, by the way? You certainly don't seem to be from a country that suffers from drug addicts, I live in Brazil.

[–] Version@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Brazil has one of the most strict anti drug laws in the world, isn’t that correct?

I am from Germany. We‘ll legalize weed soon.

And yes, drug usage certainly can affect other people, sorry about the confusion. My point was primarily about normal drug usage, not addicts. Criminalizing it certainly doesn‘t seem to help, every single country that tried this completely failed. On the other hand, countries that do the exact opposite seem to be pretty successful.

Edit: You just seem to ignore facts. It works in other countries. The war on drugs failed.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't have the lawless Bolivia next to you, producing tons of weed every day. There lies the difference.

Also you can't imagine the sheer amount of Bolivians who have emigrated here, there are at least 7 or 10 houses full of Bolivians in my street. We might as well just unite with them and establish the "Republic of Brazil and Bolivia" at this point.

[–] Version@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, but we have the Netherlands, where a lot of weed comes from (illegally but also some legally).

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now I'm jealous. I wish we could trade places.

[–] Version@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand. I am not denying any of your problems, I just don‘t think that criminalizing it is a solution. It didn’t work in the past and it also won‘t work in the future.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's a very mature point of view. Thank you for not being like the others in this thread. We need more individuals who are capable of thought and who express those thoughts.

[–] Cableferret@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago

Because people in power need excuses to hit people they don't like without having to pay weregild for it. That's it, that's the entire purpose of laws. The whole "protecting society" theory is a convenient smokescreen that we've all bought into through generations upon generations of Stockholm syndrome and the fact that we all also want to hit people and be justified in doing so from time to time.