this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
394 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

59466 readers
3450 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The company's website quotes a storage density of 3.5 kWh/kg and a storage system taking up 3 cubic meters beving able to store 100,000 kWh: https://www.photoncycle.com/technology

I tried to find the patent but it sounds like the application process isn't complete yet.

These are the kind of claims you hear from a startup seeking its next round of funding. I'd take it with a huge grain of salt.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

the numbers do seem absurdly high. That's 5 times higher energy density than the current state-of-the-art

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'd take it with an amount of salt resembling the Dead Sea. This is absolutely fake.