this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
66 points (94.6% liked)

Australia

3613 readers
68 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Old, but unfortunately more relevant than ever

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course. That we're big or influential in any way wasn't my point. My point was i'm glad theres a space that isn't captured by those interests.

"Politically aligned (We aren't at all)", you remind me of a funny story i heard about a US national anarchist movement meet up. I think it was from Steven Keen on the debunking economics podcast.

They decided to all meet together for a two or three day conference and begin a more organised push for their political aims. By the end of the time not even a Chairperson had been decided on due to disagreements. And this is just a section of the so called 'left'.

Its a bit pithy i know but i thought, the original telling at least, was funny.

I'm assuming we can agree there is a progressive bias in the commentary, and types of content shared here, otherwise the story makes no sense.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

and begin a more organised push for their political aims.

"Anarchists, let's unite, and seize power from the corrupt government! Ok, so first we need a leader...."

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m assuming we can agree there is a progressive bias in the commentary, and types of content shared here, otherwise the story makes no sense.

I agree that the majority of users tend to swing in that direction. But - that's it. There is no site-wide agenda to align with any specific political party. That "progressive" tug may lead those users to vote for Green, Teal, Labor or independant. That does nothing to suggest that people should not vote LNP, nor do we tell people how that should vote. This is what I mean by not being politically aligned. I suspect that if we were somehow able to get an accurate poll of users, sorted by party that LNP would middle of the pack. Behind Greens/Labor but ahead of the others.

Maybe i should have made the assumption comment more clear by specifying 'Note:'. But this was an addendum to the above story. Because i realised if we don't agree on the bias, then the story makes little sense. And i'd need to explain it more.

In terms of a site wide political agenda, i never said there was. Telling people how to vote. I haven't. Please don't insinuate that i have.

We all have our biases and interests, mine probably come across fairly strongly due to my fairly high activity. But a lot of what I post is just to keep c/Perth relatively interesting and active.

For your last comment. Its an interesting hypothetical. I'd be surprised with a poll result where the LNP landed in the middle of the pack for aussie-zone, especially the Nationals in that. It would actually gratify me, as Nationals are generally more popular in rural areas, and i've tried to incorporate more than just Perth articles in my run of base posts for c/Perth.