306
Hikers rescued after following non-existent trail on Google Maps
(www.smh.com.au)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
306 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
55562 readers
3872 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I use Osmand for trails in the woods, it is decently accurate in my country and also has a ton of other features
Yea it's clunky as hell and unusable for driving, but as a browsable walking map it's the best
Organic maps
Is not much better unfortunately, searching is garbage too
I've had some good luck but it definitely needs some work still
I'm also a happy osmand+ user, but once i got lost in the middle of a field / bush. I'm sure there was a trail once, but not safe to follow. Said bush was not very dense, so we though multiple times: Ok, this could be the way. Or that path?
Was the same for me this vacation. Gladly we were on a smaller mountain which was completely surrounded by villages, so we knew that just going down the mountain would lead to a bus that could bring us to the hotel, so we didnt care that much.
I use my eyes and generic sense of direction.
+rep for osmand