this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
101 points (92.4% liked)

Programming

17351 readers
310 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marietta_man@yall.theatl.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Scala. Expressive, concise, can scale from simple to sophisticated. Sufficiently powerful - has metaprogramming, advanced types. Runs on a world-class runtime and takes advantage of a huge, mature package ecosystem that isn’t going anywhere.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Seconded. The metaprogramming aspect of Scala is getting better and better.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Sufficiently powerful" is a bit of an understatement when it comes to Scala. Honestly may have a bit too many features for my taste, it's not a small language

[–] SrTobi@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually the language is quite small. The features, it has, are just quite powerful and have huge synergies so that it seems that you have a lot of complex features. It has a lot of weird corner case stuff, but most of that is because of the jvm and other languages have that too unfortunately.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a good point about the synergies, something like eg. a type system that's expressive enough to be Turing-complete is going to have some effects. You're right that it might just feel like a "kitchen sink language" due to complexity of the features it has, but then again I suppose it's sort of one and the same where a language's complexity comes from.

But it's no Swift, at least; now that language really does have everything and the kitchen sink.