this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
394 points (95.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35400 readers
925 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

did i say mildly i meant want to nuke it from orbit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nuke@yah.lol 37 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I don't think the average person understands how advanced bots have become at bypassing captchas now. Users will see this and be upset, and understandably so, but I'm telling you there is a big problem right now and devs are having trouble keeping up.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s nice, they should think about average people with learning disabilities and how hard it is for them to keep up.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but, there's probably not any way to make this easier while still stopping bots. Either they do no captcha and you can't compete with all the non-humans using whatever service, or they do this. Pick your poison.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who said no captcha? This is an asinine argument.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I did. Really, it's a binary choice. Uncomfortably hard captcha, or no captcha. Ineffective captcha wastes everyone's time.

Maybe you have an idea for one that will still be effective while being easier, but I don't, and apparently they, the professionals, don't either. Until such a system surfaces, this is it.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Numerical processing disorders are fairly common and it will be interesting watching devs handle class action lawsuits when they make captchas so difficult for a portion of the population that they effectively get locked out. This isn’t a difficult concept, and they can come up with something better than this. Your responses ignore the reality for disabled individuals.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

and they can come up with something better than this

I bet they can't. Soon enough they probably are just going to have to accept some users will be bots.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If that’s the reality so be it, but making existing accounts and services inaccessible to those with processing disorders will likely be even worse for them in the long run if they keep turning out these kind of captchas.

[–] HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you are saying but I do not think making services inaccsessible for a part of the population will be worst in the long run. As the OP of this threat said, bots are a hugh problem. Even with moderate resources a motivated party can do a lot of harm if allowed to have their bots to have access to the service, misinformation is the danger that readily comes to mind. In that sense is easier and more effective -not better or fair- to restrict the access for some, and catch most of bots.

But at the end of the day is all futile, AI will be able to solve most -if not all of- these puzzles soon enough. The best solution imo is to let the bots in, teach people how to read critally and how to cool down before speaking/posting.

But from a bussiness point of view educating people is not very palatable in most cases.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You should stuff that comment back up your ass where it came from.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The acceleration I'm seeing now makes me think we've reached a terminal point. There will be no way to tell humans from bots quickly, cheaply and anonymously soon, and services will just have to adapt or die.

[–] dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

Google's approach of just monitoring your behaviour in the browser is still the most humane and it pisses me off that you literally have to serve all your data to them so they can even decide to serve you with their ads.