this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
189 points (96.6% liked)

Fediverse

28388 readers
793 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The incentive might become more apparent as time goes on.

  • long term up-time commitments
  • stability guarantees
  • dedicated Moderation services
  • dedicated help service
  • performance guarantees
  • additional features or parallel services beyond ordinary masto (eg search, blogging, feed sorting/algorithms, or even fusion of additional platforms like lemmy)
  • active sponsorship of developers contributing back to masto
  • subscription is part of a dedicated app too (see, eg, Mammoth)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a Mastodon subscriber on a typical server, I haven’t found any of that to be particularly necessary. Perhaps there are some advanced users who might find it useful though. 

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. I feel like long term stability, up time and performance would be valuable to many users. In many ways I’d say just going on to mastodon.social is a bit of a cop out as it heavily dilutes the decentralised structure that is arguably the point of all of this. Multiple paid instances would be healthier. And there, as a user on a relatively peripheral instance but one that is paid-for, longevity and stability become increasingly valuable.

Otherwise, instance providers putting the work into trying to provide a relatively “complete” fediverse palette of tools while making it as easy as possible for the users could also be interesting.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What I mean is that long-term stability and up time don’t seem to be a problem for current servers.

[–] thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's definitely an issue with small, niche servers unfortunately. Had a friend's just go down unexpectedly this week with no warning to let the handful of people on there migrate, so they're starting over from scratch. My craft server shut down a couple weeks ago although we did get a month warning there so could go through the proper migration process.

I try and donate to all my Fedi servers just to make it worth the admin's while, because I prefer smaller servers in general but don't want them to suddenly disappear!

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yea I’d say it isn’t a problem for anyone until it is. All of the notable examples of a server going down that I’ve seen were a surprise to its users. On top of that, I’d expect many have fairly hefty expectations of their server’s longevity. Like 10-15 years, more or less as long as they’ve been using Twitter etc.