this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
1615 points (99.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35414 readers
548 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Myrbolg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

God damnit. I though Samsung got better.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it Samsung or the provider?

Verizon does this all the time with my family members no matter who the manufacturer is. If you get the phone from a Verizon store instead of carrier-unlocked they pull this crap all the time.

I remember on some of my older phones Verizon would not only install apps I didn't want, but they'd flag them as system apps so they couldn't be disabled.

[–] theonetruedroid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's the provider. These people don't know what they are talking about.

[–] power@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Samsung allowing this to happen is bad though

[–] theonetruedroid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's like saying Samsung shouldn't allow you to install any apps. If Verizon bought the phone they can put whatever they want on it before they sell it to you. And then when you buy it, you delete or put whatever you want on it.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

No, it's nothing like that at all. Apple doesn't let carriers install bloat onto their phones. I'm pretty sure Pixels don't get this sort of bloat. But Samsung clearly does.

[–] power@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This happens on unlocked phones too. My Galaxy S21 has apps installed on it whenever I have a different provider (Trafcone, AT&T, etc.). It's not just when it's a phone resold from the provider.

[–] eth0p@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a "feature," in fact...

Under What to expect on this support page, it says:

  • The phone branding, network configuration, carrier features, and system apps will be different based on the SIM card you insert or the carrier linked to the eSIM.

  • The new carrier's settings menus will be applied.

  • The previous carrier's apps will be disabled.

The correct approach from a UX perspective would have been to display an out-of-box experience wizard that gives the user an option to either use the recommended defaults, or customize what gets installed.

Unfortunately, many manufacturers don't do that, and just install the apps unconditionally and with system-level permissions. And even if they did, it's likely that many of the carrier apps will either have a manifest value that requires them to be installed, be unlabeled (e.g. com.example.carrier.msm.mdm.MDM), or misleadingly named to appear essential (e.g. "Mobile Services Manager").

[–] GordonFremen@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been on 4-5 MVNOs with Pixel phones. Am I just lucky, or does Google not allow these shenanigans?

[–] eth0p@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago

It's possible that Google doesn't, although that would be weird since the ability to push apps is probably standardized and baked into the stock Android OS source code.

Or maybe you just used MVNOs that don't purposefully install anything that isn't strictly necessary.

Android OS developers or software devs working for cell providers would probably know the answer, though.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I just lucky, or does Google not allow these shenanigans?

Android phones from regular retail and not sold via a provider do not have that, no matter if Samsung, Pixel, or another brand.

[–] eth0p@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

Anecdotally, I can confirm otherwise. I bought an unlocked Galaxy phone directly from Samsung, and putting in a SIM card provisioned it for my cell provider and installed their apps.

Thankfully, I'm not on a provider that pushes adware.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Samsung's PR got better, not the company.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That will never be true