this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
1217 points (96.9% liked)

tumblr

3416 readers
345 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's less that the statement is false. But more that the statement is being made at all.

It's like writing a post about how people are too quick to dismiss women as being overemotional, and someone commenting on it by saying

I'm not saying you have to be nice to or defend hysterical women, but don't treat them as crazy just because they are women. Treat them as crazy because they are crazy.

It's just bringing up a stereotype that acts as an excuse to deny men empathy, in the same way as mine does to dismiss women.

I don't disagree with the general message of "Judge people for who they are", but the way it's written is tone death at best.

Maybe the circle they're in is just pretty misandrist so it needs saying. But it just seems unnecessary to me.

[โ€“] lurker2718@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

I can totally understand your point. While trying to argue against it, i find myself agreeing even more to it.
Only one remark: As you say, the message is in any case not really appropriate for the preceding texts. However, i still think the statement can be interpreted in a constructive view and i try to give the benefit of doubt.