This year. It started in October. Using your numbers, they have done half a years worth of murder in about 12th of the time, even with the USA drone striking weddings. Ones horrific, the other is a genocide.

This all started last month, not in January, we don't know what the per year murder rate is but we can assume it would be around 132,000 if Israel continues the way they are currently.

[–] statist43@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, you could assume, there you are right. But it still didnt happen, I hope they will stop any second, but thats just wishful thinking.

But just to see what the US did..

Israel could go on for almost 3 years like this and would have the same death toll then the US because of 9/11.

And thats sick. What the US did is sick, same as what Israel is doing now.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yum, yes duh. A higher rate of death over 20 years is much different then a single month.

[–] statist43@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you say 200,000-300,000 deaths in 20 years is better that 11,000 in one month?

Wtf?

I really dont fucking know how americans can justify bullshit like this.

Its 20,000-30,000 dead people a year, I know its not like 11,000 in a month, but I really hope that israel is going to stop soon.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do math. 200000÷20=10000 a year 833.3 repeating.

300000÷30= 15000 a year or 1250 a month

It is objective better.

Your high of you think 10000 a month is better than 10000 a year.

[–] statist43@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I never said better. Its fucked up compared to really fucked up.

You keep justifying the USs shit to feel better? The same thing are the Israelis doing probably.

Nobody wants to be the Genocide maker.

Keep on living your life, thinking that the US killing civillians is somehow better than Israel killing civillians.

I did the math, few comments above.

When Israel goes on like this they will have 130,000 deaths per year, so they could go on for 3 years and be up with the same numbers as the US after 9/11.

Its just faster, and would be horrible. So I just hope the killing will end soon, and that you see then how fucked up the US strategy after 9/11 was. Israel uses the same argument as the US.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Survey says:?

So you say 200,000-300,000 deaths in 20 years is better that 11,000 in one month?

I didn't say either was morally correct but one is clearly statistically worse as a matter of casualties. Why you think that's attempting justifying either is beyond me and perhaps something you aught to reflect on personally.

Correct.

I never said anything about it's morality but causing a years worth of deaths in Afghanistan/Iraq in a single month with the vast majority being non combatants and over a third being non military aged children.

Perhaps you did, I didn't see it but you certainly haven't reflected on it if you think your argument is sound.

That would be more deaths bud.

Oh "it's just faster" gotcha. Industrialized murder is somehow more ethically sound to you, gotcha.

[–] statist43@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Its faster, the (still, and hopefully fictional) scenario where Israel continues at tbe same killrate.

Wikipedia says 180,000 in afgahnistan and around 150,000-200,000 in Irak

That would be more deaths bud.

I dont know why we have this discussion, but both is horrible and there is no justification of killing civillians at any rate.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I used the numbers you provided, if they're wrong it's because you were wrong and similarly a shaker number over a longer period provides more support for my argument not less as you imply.

No one is denying both are horrible. You're the only one who's claimed I've taken a stance on it at all.