this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)

Games

31801 readers
956 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This feels like some of the best PC requirements we’ve seen lately.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah I am really curious how that's going to affect things on PC because they had all this talk about how going through the portals and having those instant level transitions were only possible with efficient SSD storage mechanisms. Maybe they found a way around it by just caching to memory more? Or maybe they're taking advantage of DirectStorage.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was always just marketing speak by Sony to hype up their console and game. There’s legitimately no technical reason why the rift stuff can’t be done on a standard hdd. Anyone that bought into their marketing BS is a sucker.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree with you that there's a lot of marketing speak, saying that it can be done on a HDD is pushing it IMHO. Even without Direct Storage, the impact of SSDs vs HDDs already makes a huge difference in loading times for modern PC games.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rifts are in pre-determined spots, and always take you to the same pre-determined spot. There's literally nothing new there, and nothing that can't be done on a HDD - which is why the game doesn't require an HDD on PC. Streaming levels on the fly has been around for decades, it has never required an SSD.

Titanfall 2 doesn't require an SSD in the level where you jump between timelines and the world changes around you instantly on demand.

I'm not saying SSD's don't make a huge difference in loading times, I'm saying that they aren't required for what Ratchet and Clank does, which is right based on the fact that it doesn't even need an SSD.