this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
477 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

4302 readers
722 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Stuka@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

There was always someone deciding what the public did or didn't see, it's just a different someone now.

The difference is with the internet you have the ability to instantly verify information, but most choose not to and instead just let their information be served. Its not that black and white, but most people are gonna believe what's served to them without much question, especially if it reinforces a bias.

[โ€“] aaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The difference is with the internet you have the ability to instantly verify information

This is missing a lot of nuance. Let's face it, verifying information on the Internet is not only a learned skill, it also takes time to do, particularly when it's the latest news with very limited available information.

Granted, we are usually talking about 10-30 minutes of time, depending on what you're verifying. But let's not pretend it's instant or even necessarily easy. There's a lot of information to sift through, and if you aren't practiced in spotting misinformation (and even sometimes if you are) you won't know to reject some of it off hand.

I don't blame people for not knowing they should verify news. I do blame people who believe everything they want to hear, and none of what they don't.