this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1342 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59629 readers
2895 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"with wind the single-biggest contributor.... Power production costs have declined “by almost half” .... And the clean energy sector has created 50,000 new jobs.... Ask me what was the impact on the electricity sector in Uruguay after this tragic war in Europe — zero."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/UY

You can select 30d, year... And see how much was used for that period.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not too much biomass fortunately. But even with some googling I can't seem to find how anyone plans to produce enough biomass to keep this going

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

53% of power currently being generated by wind, the rest hydro. So there you go. They seem to be doing it, so there's your answer.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yes they have multiple forms of energy generation, that does not answer the question as to wether their biofuel is sustainable. Yes it's carbon neutral (ish) but can they produce the biomass as fast as they consume it?

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

What is that unknown bar meant to be?

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know how much I trust that website. It states that British Columbia has 100% of its power generation from an unknown source, which it labels as "500 grams per kwhr" equivalent to coal. But we know that 100% of British Columbia's electricity comes from hydro...

[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The website's number of 500g / kilowatt hour is completely wrong.

This is what BC hydro says:

An efficient, low cost electricity system for B.C. More than 90% of BC Hydro's generation is produced by hydroelectric generation, which is generally the most cost-effective, clean and reliable option. We also continue to investigate alternative sources of energy, such as wind and wave power.

We generate over 43,000 gigawatt hours of electricity annually to supply more than 1.9 million residential, commercial and industrial customers.

Over 80% of BC Hydro's installed generating capacity is at hydroelectric installations in the Peace and Columbia river basins.


About 87% of electricity in B.C. is produced from hydroelectric sources. B.C. is home to roughly 16 000 MW of hydroelectric capacity, most of which is located on the Columbia River in southeastern B.C. and the Peace River in the northeast. Site C, a new 1 100 MW hydroelectric facility, is currently under construction on the Peace River. The project is expected to be completed in 2025.

The greenhouse gas intensity of B.C.’s electricity grid Footnote 2 measured as the GHGs emitted in the generation of the province’s electric power, was 7.6 grams of CO2e per kilowatt-hour (g of CO2e per kWh) electricity generated in 2020. This is a 70% reduction from the province’s 2005 level of 24 g of CO2e per kWh. The national average in 2020 was 110 g of CO2e per kWh (Figure 8).