this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1047 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

38916 readers
149 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

It’s not wild speculation as there is compelling, if incomplete, evidence. And to describe everyone’s reaction as “bandwagoning” is ridiculous. Firefox and Mullvad are my daily drivers. This directly impacts me. The fediverse is going to have a disproportionate number of non-chrome users.

[–] schwim@reddthat.com -1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I also use FF solely and have no slowdowns on YT. I guess they like my copy of the browser.

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"works fine on my machine lol" is unhelpful and useless.

It's very well known that Google makes heavy use of a/b testing. They did it with the adblock block and they're doing it with this

[–] schwim@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"It happens all the time" and "they always do *" is also comically unhelpful and useless. I'm getting a pot/kettle vibe from those that seem to take offense at my comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)