this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
892 points (93.8% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
582 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes sense in a time without autopilot and the pilots actually had to fly the while time and sometimes really wrestle with the controls. Now it's all automated so it's not nearly as impressive.

[–] dfc09@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm no expert, but I'm fairly certain takeoff and landing is still fully manual. Autopilot only happens once you hit cruise altitude where the risk of crashing is very very low.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Even if the autopilot didn't help during landing, which it does, the pilot is still not nearly as tired as if they had to actually fly the whole time.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OK yes, pilots are waay overworked because of the limited number of them. That has nothing to do with actual flying

Edit: From your article - “Concern over pilot fatigue was one of the primary reasons that ALPA was created back in 1931, when operators regularly engaged in ‘pilot pushing,’ forcing pilots to fly long hours to maintain demanding schedules,” said Capt. Brian Noyes (United), chair of ALPA’s Flight Time/Duty Time Committee, which is responsible for educating ALPA pilots about the risks associated with fatigue and the regulations and safety programs currently in place to help mitigate those risks.