this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
384 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

58306 readers
3880 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (4 children)

He really made a bad deal on that website. Monetarily anyway.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but at the end of the day, does it really matter? It's like made up numbers that never run out. He's still set for life, no real consequence. He feels this less than someone who misses a car payment one month.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 21 points 10 months ago

That's the really crazy thing. With the market value crash of Twitter he lost more money than the GDP of a small country. Yet, it practically makes no difference to him.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How much of his own money did he really lose though? Didn’t he have a bunch of people throw in with him?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Around $22Bn, that's how much he had to sell on Tesla stock. The other half was a loan from several banks and investors that got saddled to Twitter itself. These things are public, that's how we know most of the loan money came from the Saudi crown.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, he probably wanted it in order to influence the election, but the way things are going it might but be around for that. Not to mention, Twitter isn't really used by real people, it's basically just all journalists circle jerking.

[–] GigglyBobble@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seems pretty obvious, right? Someone on Lemmy once argued, he did it to avoid taxes. Failed to explain how this is profitable in the end though.

[–] BongsForJesus@lemmy.wtf 12 points 10 months ago

I remember reading an article speculating that his strategy was to bring down twitter because it was a left leaning platform, and that would appease the Saudis, or something like that. Seemed pretty far fetched. I reckon he made an ego driven power play without thinking it through and it is going about as well as anybody expected. No shenanigans, no strategy, just a more publically exposed failure than his previous business failures.