this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59087 readers
3284 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Hm, why can they not return the artifacts instead?

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

Some of those artifacts have questionable ownership claims. Its not obvious who exactly they belong to. It would be easy enough to return something to a major museum at the country of origin, but for example the Benin bronze statues have claims from nigeria the country and the royalty, who plan to integrate it to their private collection, aka we would be "returning" an important artifact to some kleptocrats safe.

Also nigerian museums are notoriously famous for "loosing" artifacts which then appear on the black market. Sone are even melted down and sold at the price of the materials.

[–] zepheriths@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Because the museum curators don't want to. Then the "morality" of stealing from someone who has the object but didn't take it them self comes up.

There isn't a reason other than ego.