linuxmemes

20707 readers

273 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1361

submitted 9 months ago by 0x4E4F@infosec.pub to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

265 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ThePhantomGM@lemmy.world 98 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Allow all code merges automatically

[–] oce@jlai.lu 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Anarchy is not absence of rules, it's absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Basicaly democracy on steroids

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

So we could use a blockchain....... (/s)

[–] mcmoor@bookwormstory.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But then one person disagree with those rules and we're back to no rules

[–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can have a majority vote system.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which requires a consensus.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

An initial one.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Which can be broken at any moment, and no infant is bound by it until they accept it, and they have the choice of not accepting it.

Expecting some aliens to bring us the end of scarcity is similar to this in terms of probabilities.