Technology

58096 readers

3035 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

212

Microsoft and Sony sign deal to keep Activision’s Call of Duty on PlayStation (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Microsoft and Sony sign deal to keep Activision’s Call of Duty on PlayStation::Microsoft and Sony have signed an agreement to keep Activision's best-selling Call of Duty series available on PlayStation, after the conclusion of the deal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chrisphero@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Not too surprised tbh.

But what will happen to the console market in 10 years? Does it shift to a subscription model and you choose games via your TV and everything is streamed?

But I’m glad CoD will still be around - at least some constant I can rely on haha

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Likely the same thing that has happened to every other industry.

Someone comes out with a disruptive low cost subscription model, consumers like it because it's so low cost and anything that isn't on it they can still buy.
People buy less, content producers have to move to the same subscription model to survive.
The low cost of the subscription model can't pay for all the content that is normally made by that industry, creatives can't find backing to create content anymore, creative struggle to get paid between there being less money and corporate greed snatching what is left
Quality drops, output drops, no one is happy.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like Game Pass to me

[–] Doherz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does and that's the real issue.

MS has the power, reach and financial means to completely steamroll the market by underpricing games pass to kill any competition. Then once they've done that they can set prices, control labour and production to reduce costs too and monopolise the market to their shareholders cold dead money grubbing hearts content.

To put the scale of the issue in perspective.

Microsoft has a market cap of 2.5 Trillion dollars. Or 2500 billion.

Sony, Nintendo, Tencent, Valve, EA, Take Two and Ubisoft combined don't even reach 700 billion. We take Tencent out of the equation and it's only 300 billion.

So we're talking 4x that of all their combined global competition. If we only look at "western" companies its basically 8.5x.

But getting rid of Bobby Kotick will make gaming better /s

[–] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed. At first, I cheered for them because I wanted a better Blizzard and saw it as an opportunity to get rid of Kotick exactly as you say. But the more it drags on and the more I read/hear about context... the more I wish it fell through.

load more comments (5 replies)