this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
335 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59317 readers
4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
335
Yes, you can have too many CPU cores - Ampere's 192-core chips break ARM64 Linux kernel in two-socket systems, company requests higher core count support (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or do what ietf did "We're running out of 32bit addresses, should we add some bits and call it an even 48? No! Let's double the number of addresses 96 fucking times!"

Start using 128bit for everything.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If you have to solve a problem, do it in a way that solves it for good.

Max value of uint128 is ~340 undecillion (~3.4e38).

[–] jsh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is it fair to assume that those are more cores than there ever has and will be made?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Honestly, I think so.