this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
161 points (89.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43380 readers
1711 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can still be called Indian, there's no reason they get a monopoly on the name... Just like people call people from USA "Americans" even though that literally applies to 35 countries, you can still call canadians "americans" or peruvians "americans". Context clues give people a lot of information, you don't need to always be explicit. You can also do exactly what I did above and specify "American Indian", which clearly gave you enough information to proceed to make the comment you did..
Because that is what they were primarily called for hundreds of years, and what many still prefer to be called today.
Note that the American Indian Movement, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Indian reservations, etc all still use the term.
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_name_controversy
It's been changing there much quicker than in the US, but, yes. And Canada's Indian Act is still in force (and still called that) today.