this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
365 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32282 readers
685 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
jackmarxist@lemmy.ml
zephyreks@lemmy.ml
OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
365
US vetoes UN resolution calling for Gaza ceasefire (www.semafor.com)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by tree@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
104 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

read more: https://www.semafor.com/article/12/08/2023/un-security-council-votes-on-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-amid-israel-hamas-conflict

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No by the US (or China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom) means veto.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Well that's dumb. But rules are rules.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

aww shucks we have to allow genocide its the rules

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

It was more meant that they couldn't vote no then not veto. That being the case they should have at least abstained like the UK.

[–] Neato@kbin.social -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's to prevent nuclear war. If everyone voted to invade or harshly punish a powerful country they could respond.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 41 points 11 months ago

That is the explanation I was given, but these days I think that’s more of a rationalization than an explanation. Closer to the truth, I think, is that those are the countries that came out of WWII the victors, and so they wrote the rules.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

oh so the only ones who ever used nukes now get to say what everyone should do with theirs?