1359
Ctrl+Alt+T (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by yesman@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 126 points 6 months ago

A GUI makes simple things simple.

A shell makes hard things possible.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 55 points 6 months ago

Me fucking with hard drives/partitions : GUI please

Me doing pretty much anything else - Terminal

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 months ago

I always install gparted in the live environment 😂... cuz... yeah, I can fuck things up and end up without my data 😂.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Really you never organoze gigs of photos? That a gui task

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not much of a picture guy personally but I see your point.

Edit: I have spent a decent amount of time organizing books and comic books and that was a pretty even split between GUI and Terminal. GUI to get them in a state that I could bulk rename/move into appropriate directory with the Terminal. I assume it would be similar with pictures.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

I spent last winter ripping all my DVDs, and I did a lot of the organizing, changing file names etc. in the terminal. Because I could automate the process even a little.

When doing TV shows, I could take the names of episodes from an online database, put those in a text file, use block edit mode and macros in Vim to format them the way I want, then use a bash command to iterate over the lines in a file and rename them all. Hell I'd probably still be at it if I had to rename that many files manually, even using copy/paste.

[-] Astaroth@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

I have a GUI file manager that I never use but I got it because I know at some point I'm going to want to be able to see thumbnails of images.

[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I see a lot of people saying they have to use a GUI tool for partition management, and I’ve never understood why.

Text based tools like parted are fairly easy to use, at least compared to other terminal tools the same people are able to use for other tasks.

What is it about partitioning that needs a GUI when other tasks don’t? Is it the visual representation of the partition layout? A general fear of borking a disk?

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 15 points 6 months ago

Is it the visual representation of the partition layout? A general fear of borking a disk?

Yes

Being able to see it helps a lot. I can and have done it via parted. My media server doesn't have a desktop environment installed. I just really would rather have a GUI when it's available as an added safeguard.

[-] aard@kyu.de 7 points 6 months ago

Problem nowadays is that changing partition tables is so rare that parted changes their commands between uses, and I never remember if fdisk nowadays has all the GPT related issues that made me try parted in the first place ironed out. Plus I can't remeber the new GPT commands and partition IDs.

I still mostly just read the help text every time because nothing else is installed - but from the speed I might be a bit faster with a well designed GUI nowadays if it is about modifying GPT disks. MBR disks I still can do with fdisk in my sleep.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

A CLI makes simple things easy to implement.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1359 points (98.2% liked)

linuxmemes

19661 readers
933 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS