Asklemmy

43755 readers

1511 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Do you consider AI art “OC” ? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HamSwagwich@showeq.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

First off all, yes they can for all practical purposes. Or, alternately, neither can humans. So the point is academic. There is little difference between the end result from an AI and a human taken at random.

Secondly, LLMs aren't really what people are talking about when they talk about AI art.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

First off all, yes they can for all practical purposes. Or, alternately, neither can humans. So the point is academic. There is little difference between the end result from an AI and a human taken at random.

Not even the AI companies' marketing departments go that far.