UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1233 readers

2 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

Congress Orders U.F.O. Records Released but Drops Bid for Broader Disclosure (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 11 months ago by HM05_Me@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Good to see some coverage through The New York Times. While it still hasn't been signed into law by the president, there doesn't seem to be any suggestion that he'll veto it. The current state of the amendment does make it easy for groups holding information on UAPs to retain that information. However, there are a lot of UAP incidents already greater than 25 years old that are known of publicly and more known by congress. This gives some power to force these groups to release some information and any potential resistance will likely spur future legislation to build on the current state of the law.