this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
128 points (99.2% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

10990 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
128
D&D and MTG designers, artists and producers lose jobs among over 1,000 Hasbro layoffs, former devs confirm (www.dicebreaker.com)
submitted 10 months ago by TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to c/dnd@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DigitalPaperTrail@kbin.social 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

In an internal memo, Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks regretted eliminating staff so close to Christmas and called the drastic decision “a lever we must pull to keep Hasbro healthy”.

I knew I heard mention of a lever pull recently, and had to dig back up the news about Bungie's layoffs: https://www.ign.com/articles/bungie-devs-say-atmosphere-is-soul-crushing-amid-layoffs-cuts-and-fear-of-total-sony-takeover

they couldn’t guarantee there wouldn’t be more layoffs, with two specifically confirming previous reports that chief people officer Holly Barbacovi outright stating that layoffs were a “lever” the company would pull again.

do these people think of it more as a slot machine lever to get paid, or a trapdoor lever to make people disappear?

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They 100% think of it as a lever that makes expenses disappear. They're often just a little bit surprised when it results in labour disappearing along side the expenses, though.

Importantly, though, this kind of dehumanizing language is purposeful, and it's extremely harmful. It makes it easier for management to treat people's livelihoods and lives as disposable.

Keep in mind that "human resources" (sometimes called "human capital" at some especially icky places) is also one of these dehumanizing terms. Treating people as resources that are available to use or process is really gross, and that's literally the name of the department.

[–] DigitalPaperTrail@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

so, alternatively, this answer boils down to: "yes"

load more comments (1 replies)