this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
56 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59392 readers
2919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm personally very interested in the "Low Power Island" and it's efficiency cores for it's efficiency cores.

S0 standby is pretty rough on high end high power laptops like my Thinkpad with it's 11th gen i9. I sometimes have power drain higher in standby than just normally on. If Windows is smart it could turn off all cores but the E E-cores and maybe make modern standby not so much worse than S1-3 standby.

The Low Power Island also has DLVR finally, but sadly the rest of the CPU doesn't.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Or maybe we could just maintain good old traditional sleep? Not like you want your laptop to be a phone with push notifications and alike

[–] doczombie@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't you? Instant wake is hella useful, especially if you are using a laptop as a laptop and moving between meeting rooms etc, constantly bumping between sleep and wake.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

S1 sleep was as fast to resume as S0 standby.

Instead I get 30+ seconds to wake from sleep, 1% battery drain per minute, and the random chance that it just overheats in my bag and crashes. At least on my Surface Pro and Intel U series laptops it's tolerable, but I'd much rather S1 standby for 30 minutes, S3 standby for 4 hours, before finally hibernating. Instead I currently get buggy S0 for 15 minutes, and hopefully it makes it to complete hibernation after that.

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Oof, felt that, my thinkpad overheated in my backpack while i was dualbooting, it was that hot so my backpack almost combusted

[–] doczombie@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah windows standby sucks. On platforms where the equivalent of s0 doesn't suck, it's awesome.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Bingo. MacBook’s are always ready to wake with little battery loss. Windows just … can’t do that ever. If phones can be expected to behave this way, computers have zero excuses they can’t.

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Man, this is why my work laptop does that. It is an all around POS so I chalked this problem up to that. I didn't know that MS deliberately broke sleep. With this knowledge I've learned how to go back to regular sleep.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Exactly, with modern CPUs and ssd there shouldn't be the need to have PCs that sleep with an eye open.