this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
285 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

59593 readers
3380 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant::FCC doubts ability to provide high-speed, low-latency service in all grant areas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shohmini@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I don't particularly like Elon, but I think a lot of people are forgetting what Starlink has done for rural areas, and areas that don't have highspeed internet. I live in the Southern US, and the only other options at my address are AT&T DSL or other satellite companies. We don't have 5G towers in the area so I can't go that route, most satellite companies have extremely low data caps, Hughesnet has a cap of 200Gbs for $150, with horrible connection, and AT&T DSL makes a 200MB download take 30-45 minutes at the fastest. My town has a population of 10k, and we're still dealing with those being the only choices. If you go 30 minutes over to the next town they have Satellite, and that's it. ISPs don't care to fix the problem unless there's another company taking customers from them with better service. Starlink has opened up a lot of the internet, and the possibility to work from home for a lot of people.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like y'all should start building your own infrastructure as others have done

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That only works when the republicans that run the place don't ban municipal internet build outs.

[–] Zoidberg@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. I truly hate Elon but I admit that Starlink works and is a good option for rural areas. But now, the irony here is that people in these areas are the first ones to point out when the government gives "hand outs" to others, and vote for the party that gives all the power to the big players, who then give the rural population the finger.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

I live out in the boonies myself, to the point dialup isn't an option. We got wireless connection akin to a cellphone connection. I tried star link and it was pretty trash compared to the ground based wireless solution even though the advertised speed and latency seemed too good to be true (because they were)

SpaceX is just massively over engineering a solution for literally 0 reason. The money that was used to design and implement could have been used to

A) lay fiber lines

B) build wireless infrastructure

C) mix of A/B

And prob still have a boatload of money left over. IMO Elon is an idiot for wanting to pollute the atmosphere and the night sky with temporary satilites (2-16 months IIRC) instead of building traditional infrastructure. Also if SpaceX collapses, star link will be done too in a matter of months

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

Well get everyone together and CHANGE THEIR FUCKING MINDS. Government is beholdent to THE PEOPLE not the other way around. If that is your excuse, well you did done fuck up

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The real problem there is all of the government handouts that have gone to the other ISPs for the purpose of wiring up everybody... Taking the money and then not delivering. And I know some years ago it was said that Comcast's internet division was running at over 90% profit margin... And like other companies that were regarded highly successful operate around 30% or less.

[–] Shohmini@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think I've read about two occasions that the government handed money to ISPs to get Internet out to rural areas, and both times the results were essentially "ISPs pocket the money, nothing changes." It's infuriating, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's happened more than twice.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Way more than twice, we've provided them around 1 trillion to wire all homes in the USA...and yea. No where near that has been done.