Linux

48334 readers

605 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

167

How many of you run a Linux phone (Pine64, Librem etc) as your daily driver? (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was going through Pine64's page again after I found the latest KDE announcement. With that said, I seem to see a lot of issues with firmware on the Pine, whilst the Librem is just plain out of budget for me. Was interested in how many people here run a Linux mobile as a daily driver, and how has your experience been?

I'm considering purchasing the Pine but I'd like a better screen, more RAM and a better CPU. Don't know if I should wait for a new model to be released (are they even planning to do that? Is the company active?). I will only really use it to browse the Web, and might even look to desolder a couple of parts that I know I won't use.

Thanks.

Edit: I am willing to watch content and use banking apps from the browser. Do you think it'll be fit for me?

Edit 2: overall, I am much saddened about the state of affairs regarding private computing on the go. I desperately hope that Linux on mobile takes off, even though its incubation looks disheartening at the moment. Thank you everyone for your comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which recent devices other than the Pixels are supported?

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot? They have a pretty big list and for all I know all are stable. https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/

[+] chitak166@lemmy.world -8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So fucking dumb how we have to look for specific models just to get support for smartphones.

Can you image if Linux only ran on HP and dell laptops?

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that's moistly on maufacters. If they don't release the kernel LOS can't do anything. Also depending on the phone it might take a while till someone picks the phone and decides to support it. Laptops do have compatibility options. But I get what your saying, it is annoying but what did you expect from such organization?

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It would be awesome if we could just install whatever like we can on pcs. On phones you still need a developer to make a specific rom for that device, we were close with Generic System Images (GSIs), but I don't think they really went anywhere

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I think you can but I'm not sure. There's Ubuntu Touch that works on some phones but it's really buggy

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago

It's just the shit design of Android: no bios and firmware must be bundled in the rom

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

Hopefully when RISCv gets there it won't be so bad.

Now that manufacturers are getting called out for it they tend to follow the support cycle upstream. Now, much of it falls on the chip makers, Qualcomm specifically supports chips for 5 years iirc (and 8 years for their industrial chips).

If the manufacturers can achieve vertical integration, like Apple has, with RISCv I think we'll see a lot more mainlined support from them.