1321
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by realitista@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

We're much worse batteries than an actual battery and we're exponentially more difficult to maintain.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

But we self replicate and all of our systems are already in place. We’re not ideal I’d wager but we’re an available resource.

Fossil fuels are a lot less efficient than solar energy … but we started there.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

This is a cute idea for a movie and all but it's incredibly impractical/unsustainable. If a system required that it's energy storage be self-replicating (for whatever reason) then you would design and fabricate that energy storage solution for that system. Not be reliant on a calorically inefficiently produced sub-system (i.e. humans).

You literally need to grow an entire human just to store energy in it. Realistically, you're looking at overfeeding a population with as much calorically dense, yet minimally energy intensive foodstuffs just to store energy in a material that's less performant than paraffin wax (body fat has an energy density of about 39 MJ/kg versus paraffin wax at about 42 MJ/kg). That's not to speak of the inefficiencies of the mixture of the storage medium (human muscle is about 5 times less energy dense than fat).

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Our primative cerebrum will keep trying to wake up.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

We just tend to break a lot and require a lot of maintenance (feeding, cleaning, repairs, and containment).

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1321 points (97.8% liked)

Comic Strips

11197 readers
2133 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS