this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
408 points (77.1% liked)

Memes

51348 readers
1047 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago (80 children)

There’s no hypocrisy here.

On one hand, the belief in a god doesn’t just end there. There are beliefs in what that god does and what he has control over. So it’s completely logical to believe that there’s no god (although, as someone else pointed out, it’s also not random arrangements of atoms).

On the other hand, simulation theory is a logical theory to rationalize the “purpose” of why we exist. It’s not a belief. The simulation doesn’t respond to prayers or requests. It’s simply conjecture or hypothesis to explain the “why” of the universe. No one who talks about simulation theory (much less who “believes” in it) pretends that the creator of the simulation is uniquely interested in them and responds to their requests and tells them how to live their life. In fact, that would go against the entire concept of simulation theory.

Religion and religious belief have specific definitions. This feels just as dishonest as people claiming that LGBTQ ideology is a religion or that evolution is a “belief”.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (13 children)

What is the purpose of such a simulation if ST is "correct"?

[–] skulblaka@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is outside of our scope of vision and equally as unknowable as the true purpose of God.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I like the other answer betta no offence 🎅

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (77 replies)